We Don’t Know Exactly What Causes ADHD. That Doesn’t Mean It Isn’t Real.

By Real Ray C on

I still see people argue that ADHD can't be a real disorder because scientists don't know exactly what causes it. But that's a strange standard to use for medicine. There are many medical conditions where we understand what happens in the body and how to diagnose and treat the condition, while scientists are still working out every detail of why it develops. ADHD is no different. We know ADHD is a neurodevelopmental condition. We know genetics play a major role, which is one reason ADHD tends to run in families. We also know that the symptoms begin in childhood, even though someone might not receive an ADHD diagnosis until they're an adult. We also know that the brains of people with ADHD can differ in how certain networks involved in attention, motivation, executive function, and impulse control develop and operate. You may have heard ADHD described as simply having “low dopamine.” That's an easy explanation, but it's not really the whole story. Dopamine and norepinephrine are involved in ADHD, but the brain isn't simply a tank of chemicals that becomes empty. Brain function is much more complicated than that. Researchers are still studying how neurotransmitters, receptors, brain networks, genetics, and development interact in ADHD. And that's actually an important distinction. We don't need to know every detail of the mechanism before we can recognize that something exists. If someone with ADHD says, “I know what I need to do, I want to do it, I've tried to do it, and somehow I still can't get myself to start,” that experience doesn't become imaginary just because neuroscience hasn't answered every question about why it happens. The same goes for struggling to regulate attention, constantly losing track of things, acting impulsively and regretting it almost immediately, or being able to spend hours completely absorbed in something interesting while struggling to focus on something that feels painfully boring. Those experiences alone don't diagnose ADHD, of course. Other conditions can cause similar problems, which is why proper assessment matters. But saying “we don't know the exact cause” is not the same thing as saying “we don't know whether it exists.” Science is still working out the full picture of ADHD. We already know enough to understand that it is much more complicated than laziness, poor discipline, or simply “not trying hard enough.” Maybe the better question isn't, “If ADHD is real, why don't scientists know exactly what causes it?”

Replies (0)